The Debate Between Creationists And Evolutionary Theorists

Rachel Summers Professor Hughs Philosophy 101 16 December 2016 The Debate Between Creationists and Evolutionary Theorists The subject of origins, or how we got here, is one of the most fundamental questions that can be asked. The important question of why we are here can’t be answered by science alone. How we answer these questions provides the basis for how we think about things, it defines our world-view. The Evolution vs. Creation debate is often referred to as the Great Debate. 20th century science has made the compelling discovery that, at some point, the universe began. Both sides of the debate Evolutionists and Creationists agree on one thing only, that the universe has not always existed. This is where their agreement ends. The why and how the universe began is where the division and dispute begins. There are two basic theories in this debate. The first is the historical default, the creation model of origins. This theory maintains that the intricate design infiltrates all things, which implies a designer. The second theory is th e more recent, atheistic explanation, the evolution model of origins. This theory suggests that the intricate design infiltrates all things and is a product of random chance and excessive time. A creationist is one who rejects scientific explanations for the origin of life and the universe, preferring a hypothesis of supernatural creation by a designer named God. The belief that people were created by God, in the image of God, is atShow MoreRelatedCreationism vs. Darwinism: A Comparative Analysis1530 Words   |  6 Pagesbasis for creationist beliefs. Additionally, Darwinism is explored and the differences between Creationism and Darwinism are analyzed. Despite overwhelming evidence that supports the existence and validity of Darwinism, there are still arguments made that attempt to discredit evolution. The battle between Creationists and Darwinists extends beyond science and religion and has proliferated academia. Although this issue has often been presented before the courts at a federal level, Creationists have repeatedlyRead MoreThe Effects Of Clinical Depression On An Individual s Dreaming1485 Words   |  6 Pagesenergies and desires that are derived from the id) wishes or offsetting emotional strategies as proposed by psychodynamic theorists like Freud and Jung. Hall devised this theory through standardized dream content scoring inventories. He used this method to demonstrate that the most frequently occurring images or ideas were not peculiar events but rather routine social interactions between the dreamer and their most regular acquaintances. The psychological factors that affect one’s dreaming would be anyRead MoreA Debate On Gods Revelation Of God1984 Words   |  8 Pagescompromise of reinterpreting Genesis to fit in evolution and millions of years, which undermines biblical authority.† Ultimately, what’s at stake in this debate is more than just a magic number of years. This debate’s significance centers on God’s revelation of Himself in Scripture and whether Scripture is relevant today or not. This issue has only become a debate in the last couple hundred years. Before the Enlightenment, people in Western cultures accepted the young earth view because the scriptural accountRead MoreEvolution vs. Intelligent Design Essay3619 Words   |  15 PagesPhilosophers, natural scientists, and theologians have long historical records of dealing with the explanations of mankinds origin, function, purpose, and ultimate destiny1. In a seemingly never-ending process of debate and debunk, the scie ntific community has clung fast to evolutionary theory as a matter of proven fact. Those opposing this view have, over the course of the twentieth century, morphed the creationistic view into something more, along the way gaining the support of a small portionRead MoreEssay on The Fallacy in Teaching Macroevolution as Scientific Theory2237 Words   |  9 Pages2011 A seemingly endless debate continues over the legitimacy of teaching evolutionary theory in classrooms, particularly in communities where religion plays a prominent role in community life. Some church leaders, teachers and school board members argue that alternate explanations provided by creationists or proponents of intelligent design should be taught alongside those of evolutionary theorists in science classrooms. People who are proponents of evolutionary theory are quick to offer aRead MoreHumans s Views On The Evolution Of The World And The Life That Inhabits It1869 Words   |  8 Pagesresistant to the evidence and scientific proof of evolution, and will creationists ever begin to accept the proven facts that invalidate everything they think is true about creationism? Creationism is a view that less than fifty percent of Americans believe in. According to an article on Stanford’s website, a creationist is someone who believes in a god who is the absolute creator of everything that inhabits the earth.1 Creationists strongly oppose a world brought on by evolution, particularly a worldRead MoreThe Impact Of Religion On The Public School System2185 Words   |  9 Pagesbecome reigning influence on world’s views. Scientific analysis has led to conclusions that provide an alternate justification for the origin of life, countering many widespread religious beliefs. Consequently, this results in a persistent dispute between the scientific community and these faithful believers. Because of the alleged legitimacy of science, society has a difficult time refuting the claims made by the science community. The significant dependability on scientific perspective creates confusionRead MoreEssay Can Intelligent Design be Empirically Proven2734 Wo rds   |  11 Pagesthat common descent is the case, albeit for reasons other than the Darwinian mechanism† (Young, 45). Common descent is the general term that is oftentimes used by advocates of the Darwinist ideology. The term is used to describe the common ancestry between species. For example, by looking at fossil records, scientists are able to point out that mankind and primates share a similar physiology with one another. Proponents may agree with some parts of common descent, but only if they are allowed to claim